Advertisement: ReviewME.com – 50% off reviews!

If you are looking for a good quality review, then you should consider approaching ReviewME.com for a review. They’re also offering 50% coupons in the short term!

As you may know, in addition to running Text Link Ads we also run ReviewMe.com. The reviews for sale at Reviewme have been outstanding. Clients have received: valuable feedback, targeted traffic, and direct links back to their website. Here are a couple of examples of ReviewMe reviews:

We are now offering 50% off reviews. Just enter “trial” into the coupon field at checkout. These reviews are for sale for a one time fee which makes for a great value. I think you will be happy with the results so please head on over to ReviewMe and try it out for yourself!

Patrick Gavin
President
http://www.Text-Link-Ads.com

Disclaimer: This posting contains my affiliate code for ReviewME: (http://www.reviewme.com/?ref=4683).

Selling Your Soul: Choose your paid blogging company carefully

Recently, I have been approached by several companies/individuals seeking to use my blog(s) as a means to reach out with advertising to my readers. Now that this blog is becoming more attractive, I guess this will happen more and more. However, while I am excited by this possibility for a number of reasons, another bunch of concerns are rearing their heads that I had not expected: one of which is appropriacy, another is editorial control, another is blog quality.

  1. Appropriacy: Are the adverts and links appropriate to my readers? Are my readers likely to want to know about these products, given my foci on this blog?
  2. Editorial Control: I had always assumed that it was I who had the final control over what and how something appeared on my blog. It never occurred to me that it could be otherwise. But apparently, it can.
  3. Blog Quality: As I have begun to blog much more than ever, with sometimes three or four posts a day, I’m beginning to feel a much greater sense of pride in what is on my blog. I haven’t really codified that ‘sense of quality’ yet. But perhaps I should.

So, anyway, here is another story about a possibly interesting, money making scheme that looked attractive until I read the terms. Once I had, I turned it down for this blog for a number of the above reasons.

I was approached by a representative from PayU2Blog with an interesting offer, much like the one on the website. Once I replied, I asked about the terms. I found out the following:

You HAVE to AGREE to Link to (within your articles) any assigned
subject. This is a requirement. If your blog has a standard theme and
you do not want to include posts with links to other topics, then I’m
sorry, our projects are not for you. You can link creatively but the
links need to be there in order to be paid.

Basically, they’d have you over a barrel. You have to post on the required subject in order to get payment for that task. You are not given any choice about whether you can choose the assignment or not (not like Blogsvertise, Blogitive, or Payperpost, or indeed ANY of the companies I have worked with so far). Not good. Since payment is bi-weekly, in theory, if you refused to post, what would happen to your owed payments?
Then it said:

If you do not mind linking to websites about other subjects then let’s move on. If your blog has a standard theme and you do not want to include posts with links to other topics, then I’m sorry, our projects are not for you.

Hello, does this blog not look like a ‘standard’ theme? Woops! Perhaps I should make it clearer for my readers. Well, I checked out the blog, and I saw a bunch of unrelated posts with assignments included, obviously. Given the concerns I outlined at the beginning of this post, I realized that following such an offer would have affected greatly all three. I declined to allow this blog to be used for such an offer. Moreover, I think it has made me wary about accepting offers like that in the future.

Although it looks attractive at $5.00 per posting, it may not be a good thing for the blogger, the blog or its readers in the long term. I will stick with paid blogging content systems that respect my choices, my values and my blog.

Paid Posting: Is mis-spelling a key word to attract visitors ethical?

In this blog, I have always strived to post the best as I can, and to ensure that the formating, language and presentation of posts are of the highest standards. Naturally, there are times when I fall short, but this offer to post took my breath away. Names have been changed to protect the guilty. Read and let me know what you think. Was I right or was I foolish?

This is what the company asked me to write about:

Please write your journal entry on http://…lifeinsurnace…. Entry should be at least 2-3 paragraphs. You can write about whatever you want but it should be something related to the link, and include at least 3 links to the web site in your entry. … (Just standard guff, nothing unusual here…)

Seems reasonable. Seems fine. It’s just a life insurance website looking for extra exposure. Nothing wrong about that. We all need some kind of life insurance, don’t we? Anyway, the offer goes on:…

Information From Advertiser: Doing a bit of an experiment on typos – please link at least once to the site with this exact text: “life insurnace quotes” Note the mispelling of the word “insurance” in both the domain name and the text to use in your link. Thanks you!

Now, I don’t mind writing about products and services, but this ‘trick’ is a way to game the search engines, or more specifically, the users who are careless in their spelling. It’s also cheaper for a website to reach top of the ranks of Google Search if a word is mis-spelled.

I was seriously unhappy about deliberately misspelling a word to trap unwary searchers, moreover, I was unhappy about creating the impression that an advertisement with a dubious ‘wrap’ would try to game people into visiting its website, and most of all, I was unhappy that such a trick would undermine my attempts at maintaining a quality website.

Naturally, I declined the opportunity, and sent a withering reply to the blog ad company approached by the advertiser.

Did I overreact? Would you have been bothered by such a link? Could I have put the words in quotation marks? What are your opinions? Did I do the right thing?