Images for Your Blog – Five Good Sources You Can Use

Posted by

3

Images are quite important for blogs, otherwise too many postings full of words can make it much more difficult for readers to read and absorb the information you are trying to convey. Largely, this is because of the way computer screens display information which makes intensive book-like reading styles much more uncomfortable. Attention spans tend to be shorter, information can only be taken in in bite-size chunks; so images play an important role in alleviating this problem.

I didn’t use to use a lot of images in my blog, until I realized that the lack of images wasn’t encouraging people to read my pages. Since then, I’ve started to include a lot of different types of images. I don’t overload each posting with images, but I try to average at least one image per post.

There are many ways you can get images for your blog:

1. Screenshots: if you are featuring, discussing or reviewing a website, a simple screenshot can be taken by pressing your “PrintScreen” button on your keyboard. You will need to crop the image, using the Windows Paint Program. Or you can find other tools to help you do this!

2. Taking Pictures: Many of you already have a digicam or a DV video cam, both of which can take acceptable pictures for the web. Obviously, the better quality camera will likely produce a better finish, but if all you have is a webcam, that’ll be sufficient. Go out, take your own pictures, like I did for several reviews on this blog, and publish them.

3. Raid your archives: If you’ve had a digicam or DV video cam for a while, you’ll likely already have hundreds or even thousands of images that you can draw on. If you have good quality slides, or negatives, you can even convert those (though you may have to buy equipment or pay someone to do that for you).

4. Free Images: There are lots of places to get free images, this link from WikiPedia will help get you started and Stock.Xchng, though you need to respect copyright and any restrictions that the owner of the images places.

5. Movies: you can include movies from obvious sources such as YouTube, too. There are now dozens of movie websites, though. Perhaps even in your own archives there are short movies that you could use. Most Digicams now take clips, even long ones. One of my clips lasted over 5 minutes, though it kills the battery! So you could even take your own clips, upload them, and place them on your website. And remember, you can generate stills from movies, too!

In short, it’s easy enough to liven up your bloggings with images, so spend a few minutes extra and make it easier on your readers – INCLUDE an image! Do you include a lot of images these days or not? Where do you get them from?

Waiting for an Iphone… Is it really worth it?

Posted by

1

(This post has been edited with this paragraph. Also the publication date has been changed to 6/29 which was intended, but my posting system screwed up royally).

Well, it seems that the queues for an Iphone aren’t only at the stores. Matt reports that activation of the service is S L O W…. I suggest you save yourself the hassle, and wait three months until the kinks are worked out of the system. It’s stupid to put yourself through this ‘ordeal’ (the words of one customer for an Iphone just to get it first!). Of course, you could just pay 35% or more and buy it on Ebay.

How to lose customers: Pandora.com

Posted by

4

Pandora’s service is without comparison: it allows you to find musical styles and within that research wonderful new artists that you wouldn’t otherwise find. This is what the website says about itself:

Pandora is a music discovery service designed to help you enjoy music you already know, and to help you discover new music you’ll love. It’s powered by the most comprehensive analysis of music ever undertaken, the Music Genome Project: a crazy project started back in early 2000 to capture the complex musical DNA of songs using a large team of highly-trained musicians.

Unfortunately, citing the DMCA, they have pulled almost the entire service for those outside the geographic USA. Recently, their chairman wrote:

Dear Pandora Visitor,

We are deeply, deeply sorry to say that due to licensing constraints, we can no longer allow access to Pandora for most listeners located outside of the U.S. We will continue to work diligently to realize the vision of a truly global Pandora, but for the time being we are required to restrict its use. We are very sad to have to do this, but there is no other alternative.

We believe that you are in Taiwan (your IP address appears to be ***.***.***.***). If you believe we have made a mistake, we apologize and ask that you please contact us at pandora-support@pandora.com

If you are a paid subscriber, please contact us at pandora-support@pandora.com and we will issue a pro-rated refund to the credit card you used to sign up. If you have been using Pandora, we will keep a record of your existing stations and bookmarked artists and songs, so that when we are able to launch in your country, they will be waiting for you.

We will be notifying listeners as licensing agreements are established in individual countries. If you would like to be notified by email when Pandora is available in your country, please enter your email address below. The pace of global licensing is hard to predict, but we have the ultimate goal of being able to offer our service everywhere.

We share your disappointment and greatly appreciate your understanding.

Sincerely,

Tim Westergen

This is an open letter to Tim Westergen,

Dear Tim Westergen,

You may share my disappointment, indeed. Unfortunately, turning away millions of customers in this fashion shows an incredible failure of both leadership and vision. When you turn away customers in this fashion, you unleashed a number of problems the consequences of which may very well come back to haunt both your company, and the US entertainment industry (which currently seems bent on extracting every possible ounce of flesh without understanding the long term consequences of such actions!) in general.

I think this decision, while understandable, is perhaps one of the most short sighted decisions I’ve ever seen, and is typical of companies in the US who resort to dealing with a technologically changing environment by employing lawyers whose sole function is to cover their own asses. I think this decision is bad for your (former) customers, your own company, and bodes ill for the US economy; and here’s why.

First, I realize as a small company that you have little choice; however, you have no idea of the goodwill that you are giving up now, that will be VERY hard to recoup or replicate, and that (when you do decide to reenter international markets) it will be MUCH harder because each of the markets you intend to enter will have developed indigenous competition that will give your company a run for its money or simply roll right over your company. Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and China all have hungry technology companies that would LOVE to have one less competitor to worry about today, so that tomorrow they won’t have to fight so hard once their market is established.

Secondly, it is clear to me and many billions outside the US who would like to download music legally, pay for it, and listen to music that isn’t otherwise available in their countries, are being denied choices by corporation lawyers who fail to find imaginative ways to solve the problems created by poorly framed laws. In many cases, many such individuals will resort to the P2P networks that have been the bane of IP laws everywhere. It’s only when companies realize that failing to serve such a market is WORSE for their profits and their business models that these customers will start to be treated well by companies such as yours.

Thirdly, the legal framework of the US is now such that more companies are now choosing to list their stocks in Europe (in London or one of the other large European bourses – they are shopping for legal frameworks that they find conducive to doing business, to making money, and to serving their customers. How long will it be before companies start shopping for countries with more favorable regimes for IP laws. With increasingly restrictive IP policies in the US, how long will it be before even US companies feel so constrained by the legislation that they have to move offshore.

Fourthy, Pandora.com has so much goodwill in its international customer base that I cannot believe you wish to throw it all away. Haven’t you any idea how much it will cost to buy such customers in the future? You have what many companies can’t buy, no matter how much money they throw at the problem, customer trust. If you turn your back on your international customers now, you will likely never get them back.

It’s one thing to say upfront who your customers are and aren’t. It’s another to turn your back on them, once they are your customers. I don’t believe that Pandora.com will recover internationally from this decision; I believe that internationally Pandora.com is now dead as a dodo. Other competitors in Europe (nearly 810 million potential listeners!), Asia (over 3.7 billion potential listeners), South America (371 million potential listeners), etc, will step in, they may not fill exactly the same void, but fill it they will.

Doubt me at your peril: in Taiwan, Kimo set up a long time ago, was recently purchased by Yahoo! and had built up an unassailable lead in online auctions over that time, such that when Ebay finally decided to enter the local market directly, they couldn’t shift the leader, no matter what they did. In fact, last year they bowed out gracelessly of this market and several others in Asia. They couldn’t buy an audience with their advertising budgets; the local market already loved Yahoo! Kimo auctions, even though Ebay had a better service, it was too late.

In effect, Pandora.com is giving up its real and tangible international business in exchange for the chance to create lots of national businesses as they license country by country. Internationally, Pandora.com could garner millions of listeners as a userbase to sell CDs to, make money from an affiliate relationship with Amazon.com (etc.), but as a series of national markets, some or many of these countries just wouldn’t have the population mass to justify the effort. In those others that are big enough, competition will prevent Pandora success, because Pandora will lose its lead.

So, thanks Tim, thanks for Pandora and all its wonders. It was a great service, but now the lawyers are running the company; I’ll be tuning to one of the other 10000 online radio stations. Thank god the internet is available outside the continental US, otherwise the RIAA would try to close that down, too.

Yours sincerely,

Kenneth

The license for this posting is granted to all but the lawyers employed by Pandora.com (or hired by Pandora.com for advising them) to read, print, copy and redistribute as you wish in its entirety. However, any Pandora.com lawyer or any RIAA lawyer who subsequently reads, receives or prints out any copy of this email, either in part or in whole, shall be liable to pay the sum of $10,000 to InvestorBlogger.com within 30 days because of their spinelessness in allowing this decision to be made.